-22+(x/35)=-25
add 22 to both sides
x/35=-3
multiply both sides by 35 to cleaf raction
x=-105
number was -105
Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
N= 1 a this is the answer hope i helped
- _ + _
r pr
Vertical line is a way to determine whether a functin is a function or not.
Answer:
If the one leaning wasn't leaning it would be the same height.
Step-by-step explanation:
If they are the same height and width (which they are) they have the same volume. Also, leaning shapes have the same volume as not leaning shapes.
Hope this helps you! :)
