Answer:
Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine, since it produces a negative net present.
Explanation:
Summary of Cash Flows on the Machine are as follows :
Year 0 = ($230,000)
Year 1 = $55,000
Year 2 = $65,000
Year 3 = $75,000
Year 4 = $75,000
Interest rate = 7%
Using the CFj Function of the Financial calculator this will be computed as :
($230,000) CF j 0
$55,000 CF j 1
$65,000 CF j 2
$75,000 CF j 3
$75,000 CF j 4
i/yr = 7%
Therefore Net Present Value is - $3,385.13
Since this is a negative Net Present Value, Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine.
D -it's trying to get you to call so it's a call to action
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": to appeal to both high and low involvement consumers.
Explanation:
Strong arguments are those that provide probable support for an idea. Weak arguments fail to provide support for different matters. Then, when talking about marketing, strong arguments are more likely to engage consumers with a product while weak arguments can attract consumers at low levels but the ideas lack reliability.
Thus,<em> infomercials can make use of both strong and weak arguments at different levels of consumer involvement.</em>
Answer:
The WACC before bond issuance is 3.9% and the WACC after bond issuance is 3.71%
Explanation:
In order to calculate the WACC before bond issuance
, we would have to calculate first the cost of equity using capital asset pricing model
.
So Using CAPM we have Rf + Beta x Market risk premium
=
0.5% + 0.85 * 4%
= 3.9%
. cost of equity
Therefore WACC before bond issuance = (Cost of equity x weight of equity + cost of debt (1-tax) x weight of debt)
= 3.9%
. WACC before bond issuance will be equal to cost of equity in this case as there is no debt issue.
In order to calculate the WACC after bond issuance we make the following calculation:
WACC after bond issuance = (Cost of equity x weight of equity + cost of debt (1-tax) x weight of debt)
= (3.9% x 0.9) + (2% x 0.1)
= 3.51% + 0.2%
= 3.71%
Answer:
Equity
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that the process theory that is most consistent with this is Equity. This basically emphasizes that quality of being fair and impartial. Which seems to be the reason that the proposal keeps getting denied, since people believe that it is not fair that fast food workers can make the same as a trained medical technician.