During the trading process Italy would give us goods such as food, crops, and even arms, whilst we gave them the same
Answer:
<h3><em /></h3><h3><em>Alexander III of Macedon (Alexander the Great), apart from being a great military tactician and in a way promoted some initial version of globalization, he was also an explorer.</em></h3><h3><em /></h3><h3><em> With his conquering, Alexander and the Macedonian soldiers managed to reach parts of the world that were either unknown, or were things of legends and myths in Europe.</em></h3><h3><em /></h3><h3><em> Multiple people that were historians, philosophers, or were interested in any science were writing down pretty much everything, and they also were trying to make maps of the newly discovered places, which gave the people in Macedon, and all the others from the region that the world is much bigger than they thought previously.</em></h3>
<em />
Answer:
Selection of state court judges in Arizona occurs through a variety of methods, varying by level of court and (in the case of the superior courts) by county population. ... courts rely on what is known as the Missouri Plan, while the superior courts ... Election · Endangered Species · Energy · Environment · Finance · Healthcare
Explanation:
Answer:
Jazz bridged the races and served as a symbol of the promise of America.
Explanation:
Jazz as a culture itself way a way for the colored audiences to express themselves to others, lots of people then had tons of stigma against that type of thing and also feared jazz.
Explanation:
As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.
Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.
The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:
Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;
Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);
The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.
