You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
9.1/3575
use long division like this
_<u>0.</u>_________
3575|91.000000
we find how many of 3575 fit into the 91
it's too big so we go farther
how many 3575 go into 910
too big so we go farther
how many 3575 go into 9100
the answer is 2 so put that in the correct place and mulitply that and put that in the correct place. then we subtract
_<u>0.</u><u>02</u>_________
3575|91.000000
-<u>71.50</u>
19.50
bring down the next number
find how many go into 19.500
the answe ris 5
_<u>0.</u><u>02</u><u>5</u>_________
3575|91.000000
-<u>71.50</u>
19.500
-<u>17.875</u>
1.625
bring down he next zero ( I fast forward and skip steps for convinience)
__
_<u>0.</u><u>02</u><u>5</u><u>455</u>_________
3575|91.000000
-<u>71.50</u>
19.500
-<u>17.875</u>
1.6250
-<u>1.4300</u>
.19500
-<u>.17875
</u> 16250
-14300
and so on untill infinity so the answe ris 0.0254555555555555 (enless fives)
Answer:
43 / 8 = 5.37
Step-by-step explanation:
each person will get around 5 pieces of candies...
Answer:
r/2 -6
Step-by-step explanation:
less than means it comes after
half of r
r/2
6 less than means subtract
r/2 -6
Answer:
Yes, They are similar by SSS PMK similar to LMQ.
Step-by-step explanation:
Similar triangles corresponding side lengths are in a proportion.
KM corresponds with MQ
PM corresponds with LM.
Set up this proportion.


Cross multiply

So the triangles ARE Similar.
- PM corresponds with LM
- KM corresponds with MQ
- PK corresponds with LQ
- So PMK is similar to LMQ