Answer:
D.
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the slope.
Then the y int is 1
It also says less than or equal to
so you shade under
Exact Form:
x
=
7
8
x
=
7
8
Decimal Form:
x
=
0.875
x
=
0.875
Rational expressions are often used in combining rates of work. Therefore, it's true.
<h3>What is rational expression?</h3>
It should be noted that a rational expression is simply defined by a rational fraction.
They're are used in combining rates of work. Fir example, if Mr John performs 1/2 of his work and does 1/3 on another day. This can be expressed as:
= 1/2 + 1/3
= 5/6
Learn more about rational expression on:
brainly.com/question/2264785
#SPJ1
Answer:
The statement is true is for any
.
Step-by-step explanation:
First, we check the identity for
:



The statement is true for
.
Then, we have to check that identity is true for
, under the assumption that
is true:
![(1^{2}+2^{2}+3^{2}+...+k^{2}) + [2\cdot (k+1)-1]^{2} = \frac{(k+1)\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)-1]\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)+1]}{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281%5E%7B2%7D%2B2%5E%7B2%7D%2B3%5E%7B2%7D%2B...%2Bk%5E%7B2%7D%29%20%2B%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28k%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29%2B1%5D%7D%7B3%7D)
![\frac{k\cdot (2\cdot k -1)\cdot (2\cdot k +1)}{3} +[2\cdot (k+1)-1]^{2} = \frac{(k+1)\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)-1]\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)+1]}{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bk%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20-1%29%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B1%29%7D%7B3%7D%20%2B%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28k%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29%2B1%5D%7D%7B3%7D)
![\frac{k\cdot (2\cdot k -1)\cdot (2\cdot k +1)+3\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)-1]^{2}}{3} = \frac{(k+1)\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)-1]\cdot [2\cdot (k+1)+1]}{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bk%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20-1%29%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B1%29%2B3%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28k%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29-1%5D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20%28k%2B1%29%2B1%5D%7D%7B3%7D)

![(2\cdot k +1)\cdot [k\cdot (2\cdot k -1)+3\cdot (2\cdot k +1)] = (k+1) \cdot (2\cdot k +1)\cdot (2\cdot k +3)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20%5Bk%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20-1%29%2B3%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B1%29%5D%20%3D%20%28k%2B1%29%20%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20%282%5Ccdot%20k%20%2B3%29)



Therefore, the statement is true for any
.