A cash payment received from a customer for a product purchased on account would be recorded as DEBIT TO CASH AND CREDIT TO ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE. Cash is debited because cash has been received by the company and it has to be debited to the asset account of cash. The account receivable is credited to record the fact that money has been received.
Answer:
c. Mobile Retailing.
Explanation:
Using a coupon on your cell phone when checking out at the Hard Rock Café, or checking in to a retail location using Foursquare mobile app is an example of Mobile Retailing.
Mobile retailing can be defined as the process of buying or shopping for goods and services through the internet by using a smartphone, mobile device or tablets. It is one of the convenient ways, potential customers use to engage in e-commerce.
Jose needs to implement and evaluate the training program chosen i<span>n the fourth and final step.
</span>Decision making<span> is the process of </span>making<span> choices by identifying a </span>decision. The process has 7 steps.
The first step is to identify the decision, the second to gather relevant information, the third to identify the alternatives. the fourth to weigh the evidence, the fifth to choose among alternatives, the sixt to take action and the last, to r<span>eview the decision.</span>
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
