They were able to trade with the Native Americans in the South. French colonizers were able to trade with pelt and fur with the Natives. Aside from that, they were to influence some of the Native Americans to convert to their religion. Some of these Natives became close allies of France as they were able to establish their colony in the Southeast part of North America
I believe the answer is: Diverse.
In local election, the barrier of entry is pretty law and a candidate does not need many budget in order to win the local election.
Because of this, the type of people who would enter the candidacy tend to come from many unique backgrounds
A negative attitude toward a person based on gender religion race or membership in a certain group is known as discrimination
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
