1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ozzi
3 years ago
10

What position in government was jackson elected to in 1828?

History
1 answer:
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
3 0
Andrew Jackson was elected to the U-S Presidency in December 2,1828. He was elected over fellow candidate John Quincy Adams.
You might be interested in
Why do Australians love sport? please answer this!!
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

Why don't they is the question you should be asking?

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was social Darwinism?
garik1379 [7]
The term "Social Darwinism" is used to refer to various ways of thinking and theories that emerged in the second half of the 19th century and tried to apply the evolutionary concept of natural selection to human society. Social Darwinists<span> held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,”

D.the process of natural superiority in the struggle for survival </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was
Dominik [7]

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on this document, what can
miss Akunina [59]

From the tone of this speaker, I can infer that the life in the colonies was of mixed feelings.

From what the speaker said, it seems like the colonists are divided on the quest for independence. According to him, the British people had done some good. The only issue he had was based on taxation.

He agrees that the British had changed the colonies by making it to flourish and have more population. He likened this growth to be the effort of the British.

He wanted the people to be grateful to the British for the protection that they received under them.

Read more on brainly.com/question/2308302?referrer=searchResults

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is an example of "Infotainment"?
dem82 [27]

Answer:

<h3>A. The O. J. Simpson trial .</h3>

Explanation:

  • The Case of O.J Simpson trial was about O.J Simpson who was acquitted for the murder of his ex-wife. The trial lasted for about a year. It was telecast in the T.V with millions of viewers following the trial.
  • Soon, the trail became a show for infotainment where viewers watched it for both information and entertainment at the same time.
  • A television show called American Crime Story: The People v. O.J. Simpson which revolves around the trial around the trial of O.J. Simpson also surfaced in the year 2016 which has gained a lot of popularity.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the formation of Israel in 1948 lead to war?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the diffusion of muslim ideas in medicine affect Europeans ?
    11·2 answers
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    6·1 answer
  • Dynasty founded by a general who took the name wendi
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think the prohibition of selling and drinking of alcohol helped in preventing Corona virus infections?
    11·2 answers
  • After World War 1 was over, science changed. Science had become so complicated regular people had trouble understanding it. Idea
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement describes an outcome of the Hundred Years’ War?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Confederate goal in the western theater during the Civil War?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the first administration so important for the future
    10·1 answer
  • HOLD<br> 1. Why did USA become concerned about the Soviet Union?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!