What was the argument in the Dred Scott case

1 answer:

7 0

Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.

Explanation:

Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.

Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.

You might be interested in

In trying to decide which of two classmates is smarter, you use the rule that "the faster people talk, the smarter they are," so

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

Judgmental heuristic.

Explanation:

As the exercise introduces with the example of the two classmates, we can see that a judgmental heuristic is a series of principles or methods by which one makes assessments, judgements, probabilities, etc., simpler. For example the rule that "the faster people talk, the smarter they are" or, another one, the taller a person is, the better they are at basketball. You make an assessment to reduce a quantity, make a probability simpler, to narrow options.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following allows managers and others to become aware of employees’ pressures, problems, and rationalizations thus e

san4es73 [151]

The correct answer is letter A

Open door policy is for the exploration of imperialist territories. According to this precept, all major capitalist nations would have equal rights when carrying out the colonization and administration of their territories. In this way, the climate of competition and distrust would be reversed.

Apparently, American politicians believed that the liberal principles of free competition should be respected in this situation.

4 0

3 years ago

In a given environment, dark-colored moths are selected because they stand out to predators against the predominantly light-colo

vekshin1

Answer:

Directional selection

Explanation:

Directional selection is a mode of natural selection in which a phenotype is favoured among other phenotypes and therefore the population with the phenotype favoured increases over time to optimize their chances of survival.

This selection usually requires a force in nature that causes a population to evolve towards one end of a trait spectrum.

In this example, dark-colored moths are selected by predators because they stand out to predators against the light-colored foliage. Therefore, this force in nature causes moths to change their phenotype and it shifts away from the dark-colored phenotype in order to increase their chances of survival so that predators do not predate them as easily because they won't stand out against the light-colored foliage.

Thus this is an example of directional selection.

7 0

3 years ago

Which good was not a significant part of the economy of royal georgia?

Alenkinab [10]

B. Naval Stores that was not a significant part

7 0

3 years ago

Alexander’s army was alert because they a. had stood guard all night. c. were poorly fed and tired. b. expected a night attack.

alex41 [277]

Answer:

I'll go with option D.They were well fed and rested, because if they were well fed they won't be hungry and if they were well rested they won't be tired.Try this.

7 0

2 years ago