The population of the fish is given by P(t) = 750(1 + 0.083)^t; where t is the number of years after 2005.
Here, t = 2050 - 2005 = 45
Population in 2050 = 750(1.083)^45 = 750(36.16) = 27,123
In linear models there is a constant additve rate of change. For example, in the equation y = mx + b, m is the constanta additivie rate of change.
In exponential models there is a constant multiplicative rate of change.
The function of the graph seems of the exponential type, so we can expect a constant multiplicative exponential rate.
We can test that using several pair of points.
The multiplicative rate of change is calcualted in this way:
[f(a) / f(b) ] / (a - b)
Use the points given in the graph: (2, 12.5) , (1, 5) , (0, 2) , (-1, 0.8)
[12.5 / 5] / (2 - 1) = 2.5
[5 / 2] / (1 - 0) = 2.5
[2 / 0.8] / (0 - (-1) ) = 2.5
Then, do doubt, the answer is 2.5
Check the picture below.
let's recall that a kite is a quadrilateral, and thus is a polygon with 4 sides
sum of all interior angles in a polygon
180(n - 2) n = number of sides
so for a quadrilateral that'd be 180( 4 - 2 ) = 360, thus
![\bf 3b+70+50+3b=360\implies 6b+120=360\implies 6b=240 \\\\\\ b=\cfrac{240}{6}\implies b=40 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \overline{XY}=\overline{YZ}\implies 3a-5=a+11\implies 2a-5=11 \\\\\\ 2a=16\implies a=\cfrac{16}{2}\implies a=8](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%203b%2B70%2B50%2B3b%3D360%5Cimplies%206b%2B120%3D360%5Cimplies%206b%3D240%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20b%3D%5Ccfrac%7B240%7D%7B6%7D%5Cimplies%20b%3D40%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Coverline%7BXY%7D%3D%5Coverline%7BYZ%7D%5Cimplies%203a-5%3Da%2B11%5Cimplies%202a-5%3D11%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%202a%3D16%5Cimplies%20a%3D%5Ccfrac%7B16%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20a%3D8)
STEP-BY-STEP SOLUTION:
( x + 4 )^2 + y^2 = 22
x^2 + 2 × x × 4 + 4^2 + y^2 = 22
x^2 + 8x + 16 + y^2 = 22
y^2 = 22 - x^2 - 8x - 16
y^2 = - x^2 - 8x + 6
FINAL ANSWER:
Therefore, the answer is:
D. y^2 = - x^2 - 8x + 6
Please mark as brainliest if you found this helpful! :)
Thank you <3
The emissions per capita measurement is a better because it shows the number of people divided by the emissions.
<h3>What is the difference between total emissions and emissions per capita?</h3>
The emissions per capita show the emissions per each citizen or inhabitant, while the total emissions show only the emissions of the country.
<h3>Which one is better?</h3>
The per capita gauge is better because whether a country is polluting more or not depends on how much each citizen pollutes. This information is useful to create laws that reduce pollution.
Learn more about pollution in: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1
