Answer:
B. who can immediately take over the family business
Explanation:
<em>Option A</em> is wrong because opportunity cost is not related to intelligence.
<em>Option C</em> is not correct because a high school graduate and a college attending student can access to student loans.
The family's wealth can not be a factor in terms of opportunity cost of attending college or a high school graduate. Therefore, <em>option D</em> is incorrect.
Option B is correct as a college attending student cannot take over the family business. So, it is his opportunity cost. On the other hand, a high school graduate can take over the business.
Answer:
- A. They are more liquid than others in their industry.
- C. They have sufficient quick assets to pay off short-term debt if needed.
Explanation:
The Acid-test and current ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company with higher figures meaning more liquidity. XYZ Company has a both a higher acid-test and current ratio so they are more liquid than others in their industry.
The Acid-test and current ratio also enable one to find out if a company is able to pay off its current obligations/ liabilities using current assets. With the acid-test ratio being above one, XYZ is able to pay off short-term debt using quick assets.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
<h2>Jill's interest in the property will: <u>Pass to Jill's heirs </u>(Option B)</h2>
Explanation:
Let us understand the meaning of tenancy: It is the "possession of any property which might be land or building and get connected as tenant".
In contrast, ownership means the property belongs that person alone or in partnership.
Understanding the above terms, We can say, Jack and Jill have been a tenant and after ten years, Jill dies. So the rest of the interest in the property will definitely go to his heirs only.
It cannot be passed to Jack because Jill's interest will not be paid by other person except for Jill's heirs. Jack heirs are no way responsible or own the property of Jack.
Answer:
d. there is a shortage and the interest rate is below the equilibrium level.
Explanation:
If the quantity of loanable funds demanded exceeds the quantity of loanable funds supplied, there is less money available for loans than the required, which characterizes a shortage. Higher interest rates decrease the demand while lower rates increase demand; if demand is higher than supply, the interest rate is lower than the equilibrium rate.
Therefore, there is a shortage and the interest rate is below the equilibrium level.
