Answer:
The question is not so clear and complete
Step-by-step explanation:
But for questions like this, since the equation has been given, what is expected is for us to make comparison, compare the RHS with the LHS or by method of comparing coefficients.
We follow the stated conditions since we are told that b and c are both integers which are greater than 1 and b is less than the product of cb. from these conditions, we can compare and get the values of b , c and d.
Another approach is to assume values, make assumptions with the stated conditions, however, our assumptions must be valid and correct if we substitute the assumed values of b, c and d in the equation, it must arrive at the same answer for the RHS. i.e LHS = RHS
Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Composite Function</u>
Suppose f(x) and g(x) are real functions, the composite function named
is defined as:

The composite function can be found by substituting g into f.
We are given these functions:



Find:
a) h(g(x))
Substituting g into h:

b) h(g(f(x))
First we find g(f(x)):

Operating:

Simplifying:

Now find h(g(f(x)) replacing the above equation into h:

Simplifying and rearranging:


If you substitute each ordered pair for x and y the only ordered pair that works is (0,-3) .
Answer: No, the data provided is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean height of women in the city differs from the national mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that

Mean height = 61.5 inches
Standard deviation = 4.4 inches
n = 100
So, test statistic value would be

At 10% level of significance, in two tail test ,
z = 1.28
Since 1.28 > -2.727
So, we will accept the null hypothesis.
Hence, No, the data provided is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean height of women in the city differs from the national mean.
Answer:
yes
yes
no
no
yes
have a good day!
Step-by-step explanation:
ive just done this today, it was really easy!