Answer:
the missing word is intellectual development
Explanation:
Binet and Simon assumed that children generally follow the same path of intellectual development, so their primary goal in creating an assessment was to compare the mental abilities of an individual child with the mental abilities of other children in the same age category.
intellectual development means the growth of a child's ability to think and reason. It's also about how they organize their minds, ideas and thoughts to make sense of the world they live in for example how they begin to reason and argue, uses words like why and because.
The donkey is the symbol of the Democratic party.
Hope this helps, please mark brainliest :)!!
Answer:Spread is going to a new location without any cause.Migration is going to a new location to escape violence,find a better job and many more.
Answer:
1. Normative
2. Positive
3. Normative
4. Normative
Explanation:
A certain situation is considered as 'normative' if it is expected to happen by the large majority of people in a certain type of society. It will be considered as 'positive' if it is not expected by most people but predicted to have a positive improvement to the society.
From the sample above, option 2 is the only positive one because not all citizens might get on board for letting the criminals off the execution.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
