The process from a disturbance destroying an area through the climax of ecological succession is called climax community.
<h3>What is an
ecological succession?</h3>
Ecological succession can be defined as a process or phenomenon through which an ecological community undergoes certain orderly and predictable changes as a result of a disturbance over time.
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that climax community is a process that occurs due to a disturbance destroying an area through the climax of ecological succession.
Read more on ecological succession here: brainly.com/question/17622379
#SPJ1
Answer:
The bombing was probably mentioned in the film because it was a recent tragic that took place, that could still be affecting the characters or the people around them.
Explanation:
Answer:
4) downward mobility
Explanation:
Social mobility is the movement of the citizens, individuals, families, or the groups through the system of the social stratification or hierarchy.
If the movement involves the loss in the social class and the economy, it is known as downward mobility.
Thus, in the given case study in which the people after the recession, lost their jobs, house and many other circumstance, shows that it was a time of downward mobility for these people.
Answer:
Chief information officer
Explanation:
The Chief Information Officer is responsible for ensuring that individual and organizational information systems are reliable, secure, efficient, and supportable. The duties of the CIO also includes;
1. developing and maintaining information security policies, procedures, and control techniques to address all applicable requirements,
2. overseeing personnel with significant responsibilities for information security and ensuring that the personnel are adequately trained
3. Ensuring that the organization-wide information security program is effectively implemented.
Answer:
Two advantages of limiting terms of government offices are to curb corruption and increase public accountability.
Explanation:
Limiting the term that public officials can serve in government positions can make the administration of public offices more transparent because it discourages corruption as no official is seated for very long in any one public office. The rules and regulations are kept transparent and no one can change the terms of administration to favor themselves for longer terms in office. One of the disadvantages is that long term policy decisions are less likely to be implemented and public officials build less expertise in state administration. There can also be talented administrators who have to leave their positions because of the term limits and this is a loss of talent for the state.
