All categories

3 years ago

V divided by 4 minus 10 =5 what is v?

Mathematics

2 answers:

love history [14]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is 60
because first you subtract 10 on both sides
then multiply 4 on both sides getting v=60

xeze [42]3 years ago

6 0

Work backwards 5+10=15

15*4=60

so 60 is your answer

You might be interested in

Find the value of x. 7, 8, and 9 please!

natima [27]

Answer:

7) x= 5, 8) x= 6, 9) x= 7

Step-by-step explanation:

As per the secant theoram, if two secant intersect outside the circle then the product of the exterior secant and total length of each secant are equal.

7) ∴ $(x+3)\times 3= (10+2)\times 2$

opening parethesis and distributing 3 with x and 3.

⇒ $3x+9=24$

subtracting 9 on both side.

⇒ $3x=15$

cross multiplying

∴ x= 5.

8) $(3+5)\times 5= (x+4)\times 4$

Opening parethesis and distributing 4 with x and 4.

⇒ $8\times 5=4x+16$

⇒ $40=4x+16$

subtracting 16 on both side.

⇒ $24=4x$

cross multiplying

∴ x= 6.

9) $(x+5)\times 5= (6+4)\times 6$

opening parethesis and distributing 5 with x and 5.

⇒ $5x+25=60$

subtracting 25 on both side.

⇒ $3x=35$

cross multiplying

∴ x= 7.

6 0

3 years ago

associate in a department store earns a commission on each suit and each pair of shoes sold. One week, she earned $47 in commiss

Len [333]

Answer: the commission that she earns for selling each suit is $13

the commission that she earns for selling each pair of shoes is $8

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the commission that she earns for selling each suit.

Let y represent the commission that she earns for selling each pair of shoes.

One week, she earned $47 in commission for selling 3 suits and a pair of shoes. It means that

3x + y = 47 - - - - - - - - - - 1

The next week, she earned $107 in commission for selling 7 suits and 2 pairs of shoes. It means that

7x + 2y = 107 - - - - -- - - - -2

Multiplying equation 1 by 2 and equation 2 by 1, it becomes

6x + 2y = 94

7x + 2y = 107

-x = -13

x = 13

Substituting x = -13 ,into equation 1, it becomes

3×13 + y = 47

39 +y = 47

y = 47 - 39 =

y = 8

7 0

4 years ago

Solve the equation. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth. 47 +3.81k = -41

Harman [31]

Answer:

i have no idea but if i had to guess it would be around -3.00k or -4.00k

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Question 3 (2 points)

enot [183]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

c. Both m(x) and p(x) have the same output value at x = 7.

Step-by-step explanation:

For input value x, m(x) is the output value.

m(7) is the output value of the function m(x) when x=7.

p(7) is the output value of the function p(x) when x=7.

The statement m(x) = p(x) for x=7 is a statement that the output values are the same at x=7.

7 0

4 years ago

DochEvi [55]

Answer:

12pi cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The Perimeter of the full shape is the sum of the lengths of the edges of the parts. For convenience in referencing them, we'll call the large curve " $curve_{big}$ " and the three smaller curves " $curve_1$ " " $curve_2$ " " $curve_3$ " in order from left to right.

Thus, the Perimeter of the full shape can be written as an equation:

$P_{overall} = Length(curve_{big})+Length(curve_1)+Length(curve_2)+Length(curve_3)$ Since all of those edge lengths are curves, and the question states that all of the curves are made from parts of circles, then we need to know how to find the length of the edge of a circle.

Parts of a circle

Since values in the diagram are diameters, use the formula for the Perimeter of a circle $P=\pi d$ (where d is the diameter).

Let's call the diameters of each of our curves " $d_{big}$ " " $d_1$ " " $d_2$ " " $d_3$ ", with the subscripts denoting which curve we're referring to.

Note that for each curve, the curve only represents half of a circle. So, to find the length of each curve, we'll need half of the full perimeter of each circle.

So for instance: $Length(curve_{big})=\frac{1}{2} \pi d_{big}$

Substituting back into the main equation above:

$P_{overall} = Length(curve_{big})+Length(curve_1)+Length(curve_2)+Length(curve_3)$ $P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi d_{big} + \frac{1}{2} \pi d_{1} + \frac{1}{2} \pi d_{2} + \frac{1}{2} \pi d_{3}$

Note that all terms have common factors of "one-half" and "pi" in them. These can be factored out:

$P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi (d_{big} + d_{1} + d_{2} +d_{3})$

The diameter for the large Curve, is the sum of the three small diameters, so $d_{big}=12cm$ , and $d_{1}=d_{2}=d_{3}=4cm$

Substituting and simplifying (in terms of pi):

$P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi ( (12cm) + (4cm) + (4cm) + (4cm) )\\P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi ( 24cm)\\P_{overall}=12 \pi cm$

Additional Understanding

Interesting for this problem, since the diameters of the 3 small curves formed the diameter of the large curve $d_{1} + d_{2} + d_{3} =d_{big}$ , one could make a different substitution into one of our formulas above:

$P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi (d_{big} + d_{1} + d_{2} +d_{3})$

$P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi (d_{big} + (d_{big}))$

$P_{overall}=\frac{1}{2} \pi (2d_{big})$

$P_{overall}=\pi d_{big}$

Notice that $\pi d_{big}$ is just the full perimeter of a circle with the big diameter.

So, if one imagined starting with a full circle with the big diameter, even though the bottom half of the circle was turned into a bunch of smaller half circles, since they were in a line along the diameter of the large circle, the full perimeter of the new shape didn't change.

The number of smaller circles doesn't need to be 3 either... as long as it goes the full distance across, right along the diameter.

7 0

2 years ago