Reading and writing can be difficult. Pulling things in large weight can also be difficult for them, hearing can be hard, and they cant memorize nor move as fast.
Thanks for asking.
Answer:
Definitely too low
Explanation:
It must have been a very popular show, when people have been lining up (that is, they started to line up even earlier) for a booth that opened at 8 A.M. This means that the tickets could have been sold for a higher price.
Answer:
The correct answer is Increase and Increase. During late adolescence people show an increase in agreeableness and an increase in emotional stability.
Explanation:
Adolescence is an age between 18 to 24 years. Late adolescence means near the age of 24, which is considered as the young adulthood. This is the age where frequent changes occur. These frequent changes may include the change in life, home, family, work, resources, roles, etc. During the late adolescence or early adulthood, it is observed that people show more agreeableness and emotional stability towards almost everything. Their decision making power becomes firm and they can take good decisions about themselves during this age. The careless and carefree period of early adolescence has gone and now the agreeableness and emotional stability has taken the place and the people are observed to be more mature during this age.
Answer:
c. Is personally liable for partnership debts.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes a general partnership. A general partnership is a financial arrangement in which two or more individuals agree to share assets, profits and liabilities. Therefore, a general partner would be liable for partnership debts. Moreover, these liabilities are unlimited (not capped) and can be paid through the seizure of the partner's assets.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
