Answer:
Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics.
Explanation:
The perspective of Americans on the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is that "Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics."
Following the invasion of the Soviet Union on Afghanistan, the then United States President, Jimmy Carter, sanctions and placed embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics, many Americans supported the decision citing that the penalty exemplified commitment many Americans believe is right or justified to the cause of fighting the oppression, and anti-democratic Soviet Union's administration.
In general, it was an increase in the service industry that led to a decline in labor union membership, since many of these workers don't need representation.
Answer:
C. They gave them lots of land to build the tracks on
Explanation:
i took the test
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
