Answer:
the central idea is like the main idea.
Explanation:
Answer:
Example A: checks and balances; Example B: separation of powers
Explanation:
The Founding Fathers were afraid of a government with too much power, which it feared could take away people's basic rights. They believed in creating a limited and constitutional government. Therefore, the U.S. Constitution divides the powers of government into three separate branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. We call this the separation of powers. Some of the powers of each branch were designed to limit, or "check," the overall power of the other branches. The purpose of these checks is to balance the branches of government so that no one branch could become too powerful. Example A is an example of checks and balances at work. The U.S. Supreme court (judicial branch) checked the power of the U.S. Congress (legislative branch) by declaring a law that they made unconstitutional. Example B shows separation of powers. The U.S. Congress (legislative branch) passed a law and the Internal Revenue Service (executive branch) enforces it. This is an example of how the U.S. Constitution divides the powers of government into three separate branches.
Correct answer choice is :
C) The Fugitive Slave Act
Explanation:
The south got by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law, the north got a new free state, California. Texas lost empire but was paid with 10 million dollars to pay for its debt. Slave trade was banned in Washington DC, but slavery was not. One of the parliamentary bills that were passed as part of the Compromise of 1850 was a new variant of the Fugitive Slave Act. At first, Clay proposed a treasury bill including these measures. Calhoun criticized the plan and asked that the North cease its efforts to restrict slavery.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two political philosophers of 17th century England who tried to give an explanation about the origin of government. They both reacted against the Divine Hereditary Right of monarchs and developed a theory that maintained that civil governments were the result of a social contract, thus, governments were an affair purely of this world and not something established by divine authority.
Answer:
they would be killed if the did not follow directions
Explanation:
