I believe the answer is: inductive reasoning
In inductive reasoning, the premises would be viewed as some sort of supply of evidence for the general conclusion. In the example above,
"all professional athletes earn a lot of money" is the premise that is used as some sort of evidence for " wes makes a lot of money", which is the speaker's conclusion.
Answer:
20 million gallons
Explanation
The market quantity supplied can be found by adding the quanirty supplied of the 5 suppliers.
When price is $1.5, tucker supplies 3 million gallons
3 + 10+2 + 5 + 0 = 20
I hope my answer helps you
The after sales services are included in the product category of market mix. Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The set of ideas or actions taken by a business entity or a company to promote its product or brand in the market. The four P’s of marketing mix are namely,
- Product - The end product that is offered for sale.
- Price – The value set for the finished good for selling.
- Place – Direct or indirect markets.
- Promotion – Public relations, advertising, etc.,
From the given, discounts comes under pricing, product image used in advertising comes under promotion and substitute goods belong to a different topic. After-sales services comes under the service branch of the product category.
Answer: Aggregate demand would shift to the left due to a decrease in US exports.
Explanation When the dollar appreciated against foreign currencies, U.S. goods and services become relatively more expensive, reducing exports and boosting imports in the United States. Such a reduction in net exports reduces aggregate demand.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.