Answer:
The main reason Thomas Paine published Common Sense was to a persuade Britain that it could not govern the colonies well
Explanation:
Answer:
enduring,
single-issue,
candidate-centered,
fusion parties.
Explanation:
<u>Enduring parties:</u>
It's the type of minor parties that have existed for a long time but isn't as successful in getting their candidate elected like the major parties. Example : The Libertarian party
<u>Single issue parties:</u>
A type of minor party that is founded to pursue one specific. agenda/legislation. Example : The Green party
<u>Candidate-Centered :</u>
A minor party that is relied on the popularity of one member rather than established political platform. Example : Party affiliated Jesse Ventura in 1988 Minnesota election.
<u>Fusion Minor Parties:</u>
A minor party that does not necessarily aim to win the election. They acted as a supporter for another bigger party that have better chance to win. Example : The tea party.
Answer:
The answer is F
Explanation:
The statement is not true
Answer:
B) Judiciary Act of 1789.
Explanation:
John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.
<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury.
</em>
Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.
