1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OverLord2011 [107]
3 years ago
9

What was a consequence of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act

History
2 answers:
Naddik [55]3 years ago
8 0
Penalties for violating antitrust laws include criminal and civil penalties:

Violations of the Sherman Act individuals can be fined up to $350,000 and sentenced to up to 3 years in prison. Companies can be fined up to $10 million.
Violations of the Clayton Act individuals injured by antitrust violations can sue the violators in court for three times the amount of damages actually suffered. These are known as treble-damages, and can also be sought in class-action antitrust lawsuits. Damages also include attorneys' fees and other litigation costs.
Violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act the FTC has the authority to issue an order that the violator stop its anticompetitive practices.
Violations of state antitrust laws state antitrust laws often prohibit the same kinds of conduct as the federal antitrust laws. As a result, the penalties state laws impose are also similar and can range from criminal to civil sanctions.
andre [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Violating the Sherman Antitrust act was a criminal offence and resulted in fines ranging from 100 Million for large corporations to 1 million for individual citizens and each with 10 years of prison.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust act banned unlawful activity regarding trade and attempted to reduce risks of monopolization. It was subsumed under the general category of an antitrust law, which prescribed which sort of practices were unlawful and let the courts decide based on individual cases. The violation of this act resulted in bitter consequences for those types of criminals, such as high economic fines and 10 years of imprisonment.

You might be interested in
Who is Abraham? William's friend William's parrot William's boss.
vovikov84 [41]

Answer: William’s parrot.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
were HUAC and senator McCarthy justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists
alexandr402 [8]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

No. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and senator McCarthywere not justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists.

What Senator McCarthy basically did was to accuse many members of the United States federal government and the US military, but he never showed any valid evic¿dence that supported his accusations.

We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who accused many that many people of supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.

4 0
3 years ago
Why do we study history? Select ALL that are true. Question 2 options: To help every culture fit in around the world To understa
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

To help every culture fit in around the world

To learn about mistakes made in the past

To know where we as people of the US have come from

To be informed citizens and better able to make informed decisions.

Explanation:

people who study history will not only improve the ability to logically understand the phenomenons or events of the past but also how it affects lives and communities across the globe. Therefore, learning history allows an individual to learn how different societies, traditions, values, and laws were in the past, and how the new ones have evolved from them. knowledge of one's culture help in their integration in different cultures and vice versa.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anyone know the answer?
shtirl [24]

Answer:

the second one is the answer

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A geologist is studying the shore along a river. She finds a pile of rocks at the base of a riverbank. These broken rock pieces
Ipatiy [6.2K]

The answer is Erosion, which is the the gradual destruction or diminution of something -- in this case, rocks. I hope this helps! For reference/perspective, sand is the product of rock erosion, because it's really just tiny remnants of crushed rock. Those "small pebbles" could be sand, but you'd have to emphasize just how small they are -- one grain of sand is just that: a grain

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does slope have an affect on soil formation
    10·1 answer
  • By 1757 Britain controlled
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an example of a residential treatment facility?
    15·1 answer
  • 25)
    12·1 answer
  • AP US History question:
    7·1 answer
  • What is one way in which the U.S. and Florida constitutions differ?
    9·2 answers
  • I will brain list i will brain list
    7·1 answer
  • What happened on the bridge that resulted in the day being known as "Bloody Sunday"?
    9·2 answers
  • "Nation Building” is on the rise in the 1800's.<br> True or False
    5·1 answer
  • Which transitional phrase is used in an essay to help sum up ideas?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!