Answer:
Habeas corpus is a centuries-old legal procedure that protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Explain a significant difference between the Iroquois and European groups that might lead to a conflict.
Basically, one of the biggest differences between the Iroquois Native American Indians and the French was that the Indians wanted to be in the position of middlemen in the lucrative fur trade between the Europeans and French and the other tribes that lived in the west. This period of history in the North American territories was known as the French and Indian Wars, from 1642 to 1698. The Algonquin tribe supported the French because they had good trade relationships with them. The Algonquin fought against the Mohawk.
"<span>a. Johnson's behavior and use of the veto prevented Republicans from getting their bills passed without Southern Democrats supporting them" is the best option, since Johnson sympathized with the South and was opposed to many aspects of Reconstruction.</span>
Answer: The Roman author Ovid describes the mortal Medusa as a beautiful maiden seduced by Poseidon in a temple of Athena. Such a sacrilege attracted the goddess' wrath, and she punished Medusa by turning her hair to snakes, some sort of a demon.
Explanation:
<span>Roman military personal equipment</span> was produced in large numbers to established patterns, and it was used in an established way. These standard patterns and uses were called the res militaris or disciplina. Its regular practice during the Roman Republic and Roman Empire led to military excellence and victory. Roman equipment (especially armor) gave them "a very distinct advantage over their barbarian enemies." [1]This did not imply that every Roman soldier had better equipment than the richer men among his opponents. According to Edward Luttwak, Roman equipment was not of a better quality than that used by the majority of its adversaries.[2]
Initially, they used weapons based on Greek and Etruscan models. On encountering the Celts, they based new varieties on Celtic equipment. To defeat the Carthaginians, they constructed an entire fleet de novo based on the Carthaginian model. Once a weapon was adopted, it became standard. The standard weapons varied somewhat during Rome's long history, but the equipment and its use were never individual.
The legionary wore his sword high on the right side of his body. This enabled it to be drawn underarm with his right hand without interfering with the shield<span> which he carried in his left.</span>
A soldier carried two spears to throw at the enemy. The spears were just over two metres* long and they were designed to bend and stick in the enemy's shield so he cannot use it to protect himself. They were difficult to pull out and will bend on impact, so they couldn't be thrown back at the attacking Roman soldiers.
<span>The pugio was a small dagger used by Roman soldiers as a sidearm. It was worn on left side.</span>
<span>
</span>
