Answer:
workplace in New York City and delivered a summons to appear in court in Maryland. The lawsuit against her relates to property damage that occurred in a home sh rented in New Jersey, which
<span>The defendant seeks to offer into
evidence the fact that the mayor was convicted two years ago of taking a bribe
to award a city contract for solid waste disposal. Yes, this is a documentary evidence
and is admissible because the mayor is already proven convicted of corruption.</span>
Are there answer choices?
Does it matter that the helicopter company <em>performed its obligation</em> under the contract?
- Yes, it does matter because they had a legally binding agreement.
<h3>What is a Contractual Agreement?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding document which two parties attest their signature to about an agreement for a particular thing with the terms clearly stated.
With this in mind, we can see that Claire who was involved in a car accident needs to go to a hospital in another state for better treatment for her injuries and she signs a contractual agreement that she would pay for the helicopter expenses.
In light of this, the argument which Claire can make to rescind the agreement is that her life was in danger and she needed the services of the helicopter company which had her Universal Right to Life.
Read more about contractual agreements here:
brainly.com/question/984979
Answer:
30 pineapples
Explanation:
The computation of the marginal product of the 11th pineapple picker is shown below:
= 11 pineapple - 10 pineapple
= 270 pineapples - 240 pineapples
= 30 pineapples
Hence, the marginal product of the 11th pineapple picker is 30 pineapples
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come