<span>The
Articles of Confederation were established to govern the new country,
with a weak executive power. It didn't take long before disputes between
states and other matters caused them to rethink their plan and develop
the US Constitution, with a more powerful executive branch (US
President).
hope it helps
</span>
Correct answer choice for question 3 is :
D) By using the veto
Explanation:
When the president determines to deny a bill, the Congress can vote on it again. If two-thirds of the Congress vote in support of the proposal, they revoke the veto. The bill becomes a law. The legislative department can evaluate rules made by Congress and signed by the president. The president's powers are restricted in the method of limits and stability. As the head of the governing department, the president assures the implementation of the regulations in our country.
____________________________________________________________
Correct answer choice for question 4 is :
A) He appoints all federal judges
Explanation:
Constitutionally, the President of the USA may not restrict the authority of the judiciary section. The Constitution is the base for all American laws, and the US Supreme Court is the final authority on what is or is not legal. The only authority the President has on the Supreme Court is the capability to elect judges to that court, with Congressional support. Which means the prevailing authority and the Conservative Congress will be struggling for a moderate judge whose version of the law is more to their desire.
____________________________________________________________
Correct answer choice for question 5 is :
B) Commutation
Explanation:
The president's power to replace a condemned person's decision to make the penalty less severe is called Commutation. Presidents have restricted the ability to act unilaterally or make management judgments on their own. Presidents have used official orders as a way of performing important plans unilaterally. Using an event-count review, the incidence of administrative orders changes with substantive reforms in the president's legislative situation.
____________________________________________________________
The answer would be A. Asian Americans.
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.
Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.
Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
