We have two points, (3,0) and (0,-3). So we can find the slope of the line:
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m=(-3-0)/(0-3)
m=-3/-3
m=1 so far for the line y=mx+b we have:
y=x+b, b is the y intercept which we were told is -3 so
y=x-3
The above is called the slope-intercept form of a line, y=mx+b, the standard form of a line is ax+by=c, so we need to get both variables on one side of the equation..
y=x-3 subtract x from both sides
-x+y=-3
While the above may be acceptable to some, technically the coefficient of x should be expressed as a positive value, so we should divide the above "solution" by -1 to get:
x-y=3
Answer:
I'm not an expert here, this is a best guess!
But I would say if there is no chance that of him incurring excess costs of less than $500, then he knows without insurance he'll end up paying at least $500, possibly more out of pocket, without the insurance.
so I would say He ends up spending the least amount out if pocket by going with option A. for $75. that's $75 out of pocket with no deductible and it covers his $500+ in excess costs....B and C would also cover the excess, but would each cost $140 or $275 out of pocket at the end of the day....
with that being said, I'd say it's worth it to buy the insurance....even if he doesn't have any excess costs, he's spent $75 dollars for the peace of mind to know he's covered either way, and if he does incur the excess costs he's spent $75 rather that $500+....Even if the excess charges are only $100, which it says there is no chance of happening, but still, then he's still saved $25 altogether. Unless I'm reading it wrong, Option A saves him the most money either way, and is worth it to buy the insurance!
Answer:
the amount increased by approximatley 12%
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(7+4) any expression 2
Answer:
1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths of sides.
(1/2)² = 1/4
Answer: 1/4
