Is being in a "habitable zone" enough to say the planet is habitable for human life? What characteristics would an Earth-like pl
anet need to have to support life? What challenges would we face traveling to and colonizing Kepler-186f, or other Earth-like planets outside of our solar system? Do you think scientists should spend time looking for Earth-like planets before we have the technology to visit them? Why or why not?
It is not. Habitable does not mean to humans but in general to life forms. It just means that <span>the range of orbits around a star within which a
planetary surface can support liquid water given sufficient atmospheric
pressure and that some form of organic life could develop, but this does mean that humans could live in them. They should definitely spend more time looking at them because the processes in those planets might be harmful to humans so humans shouldn't just try to visit them before understanding them.</span>
The necessary precautions those are required to be taken by the nurse while taking telephone orders are listed below:
The order in which different drugs are administered into the client needs to mentioned sequentially in a written format in the medical record of the patient to avoid any error.
As it is a telephone order, the nurse needs to mention the abbreviation "TO" at the end of the order.
In order to prevent any form of misinterpretation, it is necessary to spell the alphabets or numbers of those words or numbers which can be confusing to the ears.
The name of the physician who prescribed the medicine needs to be clearly mentioned along with the signature of the nurse.
Light will increase the rate of photosynthesis, should be reflected in the rate of disk rising
- no disks should rise in dark since photosynthesis requires light