I think it would be 1 5/4 that would be your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
i)
2(x+2)=7
2x+4=7
2x=7-4
2x=3
x=3/2
ii)3x + y =8 , y=x
3x + x = 8
4x = 8
x = 2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm sure you want your functions to appear as perfectly formed as possible so that others can help you. f(x) = 4(2)x should be written with the " ^ " sign to denote exponentation: f(x) = 4(2)^x
f(b) - f(a)
The formula for "average rate of change" is a.r.c. = --------------
b - a
change in function value
This is equivalent to ---------------------------------------
change in x value
For Section A: x changes from 1 to 2 and the function changes from 4(2)^1 to 4(2)^2: 8 to 16. Thus, "change in function value" is 8 for a 1-unit change in x from 1 to 2. Thus, in this Section, the a.r.c. is:
8
------ = 8 units (Section A)
1
Section B: x changes from 3 to 4, a net change of 1 unit: f(x) changes from
4(2)^3 to 4(2)^4, or 32 to 256, a net change of 224 units. Thus, the a.r.c. is
224 units
----------------- = 224 units (Section B)
1 unit
The a.r.c for Section B is 28 times greater than the a.r.c. for Section A.
This change in outcome is so great because the function f(x) is an exponential function; as x increases in unit steps, the function increases much faster (we say "exponentially").
Answer:
x = 155º
Step-by-step explanation:
y = 25° {Vertically opposite angles}
x + y = 180 {Co-interior angles are supplementary}
x + 25 = 180
Subtract 25 from both sides
x = 180 - 25
x = 155°
Answer:
8b + 27 ≤ - 29
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum of a number can be written as x or in this case as b because it is an unknown number.
b is multipled by 8 so 8b
"and 27" indicates an addition so therefore, 8b + 27
"at most -29" This is a little bit tricky but ultimately it means 8b + 27 cannot be more than -29. Therefore, it must be lesser than.
However there is a line underneath that lesser than sign meaning lesser than or equal to. I believe that "at most" indicates equal to.
Other than the lesser than or equal to sign I'm unsure about, this inequality should be correct.
