Thank you for posting you question here at brainly. I think the statement "<span>Consumers have certain rights that do not carry corresponding responsibilities." is false. Below are the right of the consumer:
</span><span>
<span><span>
<span>
Right to Safety</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Safety</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Be Informed</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Be Informed</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Choose</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Choose</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Be Heard</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Be Heard</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Redress</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Redress</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Consumer Education</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Consumer
Education</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Healthy Environment</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Healthy
Environment</span>
</span></span></span>
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer:
2.5
Explanation:
P1=$200
P2=$300
S1=100000
S2=300000
The percentage change in price is:
The percentage change in supply is:
The price elasticity of supply is given by:
The price elasticity of supply is 2.5.
Recreational boaters travelling on such water should give a wide berth and keep away from the water areas where the hunters are carrying out their activities; the boaters should be safety conscious and alert. This is necessary in order to avoid accident.
Answer:
$28.57
Explanation:
Current price = D1/(Required return-Growth rate)
D1 (Next dividend) = $2
Required return = 10% = 0.1
Growth rate = 3% = 0.03
Current price = $2/(0.1-0.03)
Current price = $2 / 0.07
Current price = $28.57143
Current price = $28.57
Hence, i will be willing to pay $28.57 for a share of Merck stock.
