Answer:
a per se violation of antitrust law.
Explanation:
The antitrust laws can be defined as those laws that are created by the US government to protect consumers from unfair means of competition in market. The aim of creating such laws is to ensure the protection of customers from corruptive business practices and also to ensure safe healthy competitive environment among same business companies.
<u>In the given scenario, the Association of Organic Food Growers is violating the antitrust law by boycotting farmers, ranchers, etc. The antitrust laws are violated by companies in several ways among them is by boycotting</u>.
Boycotting can be defined as an agreement between several companies that excludes a group of customers or market to avert them from buying aanyy goods or products.
This boycotting agreement is a per se violation of antitrust law.
Answer:
A buyer would be willing to pay at most $24,000.
Explanation:
There is a 40% chance of getting low quality cars.
Value of high quality car is $30,000.
Value of low quality car is $15,000.
Price of car that buyer will be willing to pay
=40% of lower quality+60% of higher quality
=40% of $15,000+60% of $30,000
=0.4*15,000+0.6*30,000
=$6,000+$18,000
=$24,000
So, the buyers will be willing to pay a maximum value of $24,000.
Answer:
The answer is "Option D".
Explanation:
The system's performance is gauged only by the level of service. The quality of service specifies the percentage of such goals which should be met. That likelihood of stock remaining in inventory based on a set level of Security Stock is referred to as the service level. Ex: In a contact center, the number of calls that are addressed. That percentage of consumers who have waited less than a fixed amount of time.
First option.
Indeed, some people may benefit by paying the artificial price, but not all as other people may not be able to satisffy all their demand as a price ceiling will also effectively create a shortage due to the low prices disincentivizing producers.
The exposure that should be considered is acute.
Given that,
- Howard has the chemical burn into his arm.
- Due to this, there is a small burn mark that goes after some weeks but at the same time, he does not have any other symptoms.
- Because of the burning, it is an acute expsoure.
Therefore we can conclude that the exposure that should be considered is acute.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/9223008
