The correct answer is A, B, D, E, F. Hoover did not really have a plan to pay for unemployment, he created the “President's Organization for Unemployment Relief” in 1931, which paradoxically did not provide any funding whatsoever for relief programs of any kind. It was only a way to help local relief agencies to organize their relief efforts without any government funding. As a result of the ever increasing unemployment and lack of actual relief for ordinary citizens, poverty and homelessness continued to grow. He only provided financial relief and funds to banks and financial institutions, ideologically convinced that the reason for the depression was the lack of confidence of citizens in the solvency of financial institutions. One of the most negative aspects of his Revenue Act of 1932 was that it imposed a two cent tax on every bank check, harming the finances of the very few people who were still employed. Because of his economic ideological biases which resulted in inaction to actually solve the underlying sources of the Depression, unemployment did hit 25 percent of the population. His very few government programs were only aimed to provide relief for big banks and financial institutions. Small businesses and small rural banks were collapsing everywhere (which is why I did not select option C, since large banks and corporations did benefit from his very selective relief policies). In light of these events, it is obvious that most Americans saw no end in sight to their extreme economic and social hardships and thus, Hoover was defeated by a landslide in the presidential 1932 elections (a meager 6 States carried over Roosevelt’s 42).
The answer would be : C. Set taxes on imported goods
When countries create tariffs, they set tax on imported goods to increase the price of that imported goods in the market. By doing this they will help the development of local business
Answer:
The correct answer is - option D. Officers told Jennifer that the man she identified in the photo array had been involved in other breaking-and-entering crimes.
Explanation:
In this case, Jennifer claimed that Mr. Cottons is the person who attacked her based on her memory and wrong source of information, however, it eventually found out that it was Bobby, not Cottons.
It is most likely to happen on the basis of options that she gets additional information called suggestibility, about her previous crimes and escaping. She constructed a memory on the suggestibility instead of retrieving the incident. Thus, she concluded that Mr. Cotton was her perpetrator.