Answer:
inoculation effects
Explanation:
In psychology concept, the influence of inoculation is that whenever one person persuades someone else or themselves to strengthen their particular views by advising them about their weak belief because of regular criticism from the surrounding. Therefore this way the person will put on alert from regular threat from surrounding
Moreover, if a specific "attack" arises, the individual will naturally be much more willing to protect their values against all the risk involved. By doing so they will become persistent and will probably happily accept everything they believe.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
It's shaped like an oval.
What’s the question, I don’t understand that, sorry.
No because gender doesn’t really matter it’s what counts and be who you wanna be your welcome sorry if wrong
