1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kiruha [24]
4 years ago
5

The College Student Journal (December 1992) investigated differences in traditional and nontraditional students, where nontradit

ional students are defined as 25 years or older and working. Based on the study results, we can assume the population mean and standard deviation for the GPA of nontraditional students is µ=3.5 and s=0.5. Suppose a random sample of 100 nontraditional students is selected and each student's GPA is calculated. What is the probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65?
Mathematics
1 answer:
shutvik [7]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There is a 0.13% probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65.

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the zscore of a measure X is given by

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

For this problem, we have that:

Based on the study results, we can assume the population mean and standard deviation for the GPA of nontraditional students is \mu = 3.5 and \sigma = 0.5.

We have a sample of 100 students, so we need to find the standard deviation of the sample, to use in the place of \sigma in the z score formula.

s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{100}} = \frac{0.5}{10} = 0.05.

What is the probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65?

This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 3.65. So

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{3.65 - 3.50}{0.05}

Z = 3

A zscore of 3 has a pvalue of 0.9987.

So, there is a 1-0.9987 = 0.0013 = 0.13% probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65.

You might be interested in
Please help me answer this question
sergejj [24]

Answer:

72km

Step-by-step explanation:

alex : tomos : annabelle = 2 : 3 : 4

if tomos drove 24km

tomos ratio is 3

so 3 --> 24

<em>1 --> 8 </em>

<u>total ratios --> 2 + 3 + 4 = 9</u>

so total journey is 9 --> 9 * 8 = 72km

6 0
2 years ago
Hue is arranging chairs. She can form 2 rows of a given length with 2 chairs left over, or 6 rows of that same length if she get
Nady [450]
There are 7 chairs in each row length.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let number of chairs in 1 row be 'x'.
Let total number of chairs be 'y'.
Given:
Hue can form 6 rows of a given length with 3 chairs left over.
It means that Total number of chairs is equal to chairs in 1 rows multiplied by number of rows which is 6 plus number of chairs which is left which is 3.
Framing in equation form we get.

Also Given:
Hue can form 8 rows of that same length if she gets 11 more chairs.
It means that Total number of chairs is equal to chairs in 1 rows multiplied by number of rows which is 8 minus number of chairs which is required more which is 11.
Framing in equation form we get.

From equation 1 and equation 2 we can say that L.H.S is same.
So according to law of transitivity we get;

Combining like terms we get;

Using Subtraction and Addition property we get;

Now Using Division Property we will divide both side by 2.

Hence there are 7 chairs in each row length.
8 0
3 years ago
Three assembly lines are used to produce a certain component for an airliner. To examine the production rate, a random
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis: \mu_A =\mu_B =\mu C

Alternative hypothesis: \mu_i \neq \mu_j, i,j=A,B,C

SS_{total}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x)^2 =20.5  

SS_{between}=SS_{model}=\sum_{j=1}^p n_j (\bar x_{j}-\bar x)^2 =12.333  

SS_{within}=SS_{error}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x_j)^2 =8.16667  

And we have this property  

SST=SS_{between}+SS_{within}  

The degrees of freedom for the numerator on this case is given by df_{num}=df_{within}=k-1=3-1=2 where k =3 represent the number of groups.

The degrees of freedom for the denominator on this case is given by df_{den}=df_{between}=N-K=3*6-3=15.

And the total degrees of freedom would be df=N-1=3*6 -1 =15

The mean squares between groups are given by:

MS_{between}= \frac{SS_{between}}{k-1}= \frac{12.333}{2}=6.166

And the mean squares within are:

MS_{within}= \frac{SS_{within}}{N-k}= \frac{8.1667}{15}=0.544

And the F statistic is given by:

F = \frac{MS_{betw}}{MS_{with}}= \frac{6.166}{0.544}= 11.326

And the p value is given by:

p_v= P(F_{2,15} >11.326) = 0.00105

So then since the p value is lower then the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we conclude that we have at least on mean different between the 3 groups.

b) (\bar X_B -\bar X_C) \pm t_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\frac{s^2_B}{n_B} +\frac{s^2_C}{n_C}}

The degrees of freedom are given by:

df = n_B +n_C -2= 6+6-2=10

The confidence level is 99% so then \alpha=1-0.99=0.01 and \alpha/2 =0.005 and the critical value would be: t_{\alpha/2}=3.169

The confidence interval would be given by:

(43.333 -41.5) - 3.169 \sqrt{\frac{0.6667}{6} +\frac{0.7}{6}}= 0.321

(43.333 -41.5) + 3.169 \sqrt{\frac{0.6667}{6} +\frac{0.7}{6}}=3.345

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) "is used to analyze the differences among group means in a sample".  

The sum of squares "is the sum of the square of variation, where variation is defined as the spread between each individual value and the grand mean"

Part a  

Null hypothesis: \mu_A =\mu_B =\mu C

Alternative hypothesis: \mu_i \neq \mu_j, i,j=A,B,C

If we assume that we have 3 groups and on each group from j=1,\dots,6 we have 6 individuals on each group we can define the following formulas of variation:  

SS_{total}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x)^2 =20.5  

SS_{between}=SS_{model}=\sum_{j=1}^p n_j (\bar x_{j}-\bar x)^2 =12.333  

SS_{within}=SS_{error}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x_j)^2 =8.16667  

And we have this property  

SST=SS_{between}+SS_{within}  

The degrees of freedom for the numerator on this case is given by df_{num}=df_{within}=k-1=3-1=2 where k =3 represent the number of groups.

The degrees of freedom for the denominator on this case is given by df_{den}=df_{between}=N-K=3*6-3=15.

And the total degrees of freedom would be df=N-1=3*6 -1 =15

The mean squares between groups are given by:

MS_{between}= \frac{SS_{between}}{k-1}= \frac{12.333}{2}=6.166

And the mean squares within are:

MS_{within}= \frac{SS_{within}}{N-k}= \frac{8.1667}{15}=0.544

And the F statistic is given by:

F = \frac{MS_{betw}}{MS_{with}}= \frac{6.166}{0.544}= 11.326

And the p value is given by:

p_v= P(F_{2,15} >11.326) = 0.00105

So then since the p value is lower then the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we conclude that we have at least on mean different between the 3 groups.

Part b

For this case the confidence interval for the difference woud be given by:

(\bar X_B -\bar X_C) \pm t_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\frac{s^2_B}{n_B} +\frac{s^2_C}{n_C}}

The degrees of freedom are given by:

df = n_B +n_C -2= 6+6-2=10

The confidence level is 99% so then \alpha=1-0.99=0.01 and \alpha/2 =0.005 and the critical value would be: t_{\alpha/2}=3.169

The confidence interval would be given by:

(43.333 -41.5) - 3.169 \sqrt{\frac{0.6667}{6} +\frac{0.7}{6}}= 0.321

(43.333 -41.5) + 3.169 \sqrt{\frac{0.6667}{6} +\frac{0.7}{6}}=3.345

7 0
3 years ago
Use the figure below. What is m
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

150

Step-by-step explanation:

90-60 is 30

180-30 is150

3 0
3 years ago
Are these figures are similar? If so, what is the scale factor?
tester [92]

Answer:

Yes, the scale factor is 0.6 repeating, or 0.7.

Step-by-step explanation:

You find the scale factor by dividing the smaller sides by the corresponding larger ones.

12/18 = 0.6 repeating

14/21 = 0.6 repeating

16/24 = 0.6 repeating

These triangles could be similar by SSS or SAS or ASA I think since congruent angles are shown in both triangles as well.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 4<br> When reading a music staff, you must read from the<br> space to the
    13·1 answer
  • How do you solve √x+3.5/2=1.5.
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me.
    10·2 answers
  • 1745 can be divide by
    9·2 answers
  • Bulan rows on a crew team. Her team rows their boat at a split (rate) of 2min to 500m. What is Bulan's team's rowing in m to min
    10·1 answer
  • What property is this: 3(5-6)=3x5-3x6 ?
    13·1 answer
  • If k = 23 and m<br> -14, what is ✓k + m?<br> Submit
    12·1 answer
  • Please I need this quick
    5·2 answers
  • Give three examples of equations that have the solution -6.
    13·1 answer
  • Is 16-7=4+5 true, false, or open?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!