He was<span> born in </span>Virginia<span>, to a wealthy family and grew up at their estate called </span><span>Montpelier.
hope this helps you</span>
The reason that explains why Americans living in the western United States supported the passage of the law in this question is the
"Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
This is based on the fact that during this period, the number of Chinese immigrants was increasing in the Western Part of the United States.
Many of these Chinese immigrants are working at a lower rate compared to a typical American and thereby reducing the number of available vacancies for the Americans.
Therefore, due to limited available jobs, many Americans living in the western United States supported the law's passage in this question.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option A. "Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 concern about competition for limited jobs."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24380381
The case you describe is: SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
Because the women were in charged of taking care of the kids. The men were out hunting While the women stayed home <span>so they would plant seeds. </span>
