1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
6

Imagine that you have been arrested for a speech criticizing the government. In which years and at which levels of government wo

uld this be an unconstitutional violation of your civil liberties?
History
1 answer:
umka2103 [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

If you are in the United States, this action would be an unconstitutional violation of your civil liberties since 1791, the year when the Constitution of the United States was amended for the first time to include First Amendment, that guarantes the individual freedom of speech and prohibits the government from violating that individual freedom.

Criticizing the government is a form of freedom of speech, and it is one of the differences between a constitutional republic like the United States, and a dictatorship like Hitler's Germany or modern-day North Korea.

The government does not have the right to arrest anyone for expressing criticisms or views against it, and in fact, as the government serves the people, if the majority of people are against it, it should be removed from office.

You might be interested in
The purpose of the Jay Treaty was to avoid __________.
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

War with Britain

Explanation:

The Jay Treaty was an attempt to stop Great Britain from seizing American ships.

6 0
3 years ago
Opening the Mississippi River to Commerce was especially important to
Elodia [21]
That's what I believe
a) fishiers
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.<br> Explain how the Agricultural Revolution led to the Industrial Revolution.
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

The Agricultural Revolution helped bring about the Industrial Revolution through innovations and inventions that altered how the farming process worked.Because of the decline in need for agricultural workers, many worked industrial jobs, further fueling the Industrial Revolution

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
5.) What can be done to change
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

lack men's lives are racialized contradictions. They are told that contemporary educational and professional institutions—particularly historically White institutions (HWIs)—are places where, through hard work, they can achieve the so-called American dream. However, for far too many Black men, HWIs represent racial climates that are replete with gendered racism, blocked opportunities, and mundane, extreme, environmental stress (MEES). This study examined the experiences of 661 Black men. A structural equation modeling approach was used to analyze the data. Findings indicate that as educational attainment increases toward college completion, both racial microaggressions and societal problems contribute to more than one third of the cause of MEES. Results suggest predominantly White environments are prime contexts for producing racial battle fatigue among Black men.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
(APUSH) What compromises made the union, kept the union, and made the union fall apart?
rodikova [14]
<span>he Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. Opposition was intense, but ultimately the bill passed in May of 1854. Territory north of the sacred 36°30' line was now open to popular sovereignty. The North was outraged.The political effects of Douglas' bill were enormous. Passage of the bill irrevocably split the Whig Party, one of the two major political parties in the country at the time. Every northern Whig had opposed the bill; almost every southern Whig voted for it. With the emotional issue of slavery involved, there was no way a common ground could be found. Most of the southern Whigs soon were swept into the Democratic Party. Northern Whigs reorganized themselves with other non-slavery interests to become the REPUBLICAN PARTY, the party of Abraham Lincoln. This left the Democratic Party as the sole remaining institution that crossed sectional lines. Animosity between the North and South was again on the rise. The North felt that if the Compromise of 1820 was ignored, the Compromise of 1850 could be ignored as well. Violations of the hated Fugitive Slave Law increased. Trouble was indeed back with a vengeance.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Briefly answer the following questions about the Magna Carta.
    11·2 answers
  • Of the three methods for dating the earth, how many are accurate?
    12·1 answer
  • What event contributed to a spike in lynching after 1893?
    10·2 answers
  • A lighthouse was 1,000 meters inland on a coast when it was built. After 100 years it was 10 meters inland. What most likely cha
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram of the presidential election process?
    8·2 answers
  • I’m confused on that multiple choice question
    11·1 answer
  • 3) A basketball player makes 10 of 10 free throws.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a long-term health effect of the atomic bombings on Japan?
    7·2 answers
  • With the two alliance systems of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, what could happen if a nation from one of the alliance systems attack
    6·1 answer
  • How does the central idea of this quote reflect the ideas of Taoism? It encourages people to have many children. It suggests tha
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!