Answer:
it was known for its universities
Explanation:
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
Although William Jennings Bryan lost the elections in 1896, the living and working conditions of the farmers improved remarkably. This happened because, first through the Farmers Alliance and then through the Populist Party, the farmers began to claim their rights and, although slowly, their claims began to be heard by the state and federal governments.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Being the only ones to use nuclear weapons, they KNOW the effects. And since they know that, some control and restraint must be put on such weapons.
Periodization
is thw correct answe
