The objective of <u>Fact-finding</u> is to gather data about project usability, costs, benefits, and schedules.
<h3>What is a fact finding process?</h3>
Fact-finding is known to be a kind of a non-binding process or an act that entails a qualified impartial third party that tends to make some written findings of fact as well as recommendations for the solving or handling of any issue.
Note that All costs incurred of fact-finding are borne by the employer and the union and as such, The objective of <u>Fact-finding</u> is to gather data about project usability, costs, benefits, and schedules.
Learn more about Fact-finding from
brainly.com/question/14852724
#SPJ1
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section.
Explanation:
If the wages of the Hispanics construction worker in America are less then, they will not have near as much money to send home to their relatives back in Mexico.
And if their families do not have as much as it use to be then they will not be able to buy near as much as they used to.
It means that if the construction workers don't get as much money as they used to then, neither they nor their families will be able to spend as much as they use to which will obviously hurt each of their economies.
Answer:
Explanation:
Every contact you meet should lead you to new contacts. That's why it's called networking – just like a net, every connection leads off in two or more directions. Your contacts fall into two groups: those who you immediately know might be able to help you, and those who you don't see any point in talking to.
Answer:
Revision is a process in writing of rearranging, adding, or removing paragraphs, sentences, or words. Writers may revise their writing after a draft is complete or during the composing process
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is: D) Fire the player. The team may suffer financially at first, but if the public has faith in the organization, the team and the league will benefit in the long run. If the owner keeps the tape a secret and the public finds out about his actions, the team - and society - will suffer harm from the loss of public trust.
Explanation:
Akers firmly believed that ethics were fundamental to economic competitiveness. He argued that without ethical behavior, individuals, corporations and society as a whole couldn´t be economically competitive.
So in this case, he would have simply terminated the player´s contract without regarding any of the potential downsides for the team.
