Answer:
EAW = -$17,545.71
Explanation:
initial investment = $200,000
cash inflows;
- Year 1 = $33,000
- Year 2 = $44,000
- Year 3 = $55,000
- Year 4 = $66,000
- Year 5 = $77,000
- Year 6 = $88,000
- Year 7 = $99,000
- Year 8 = $110,000
- Year 9 = $132,000
cash outflows:
- Year 1 = $20,000
- Year 2 = $30,000
- Year 3 = $40,000
- Year 4 = $50,000
- Year 5 = $60,000
- Year 6 = $70,000
- Year 7 = $80,000
- Year 8 = $90,000
- Year 9 = $100,000
EAW = equivalent annual worth = equivalent annual benefits - equivalent annual costs
to determine the EAB we must first find the PV of the cash inflows using a financial calculator = $408,348.84
EAB = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($408,348.84 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $70,905.91
to determine the EAC we must first find the PV of the cash outflows (including initial outlay) using a financial calculator = $509,395
EAC = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($509,395 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $88,451.62
EAW = $70,905.91 - $88,451.62 = -$17,545.71
Answer: Price after 1 year = $24.83
Explanation:
Return = [D1/P0 ]+ g
= [(3*1.08)/23] + 0.08
= 22.09%
We assume the return is same for next year as well.
Thus,
r = [D2/P1] + g
22.09% = (3*1.082/P1) + 8%
P1 = $24.83
<u>Thus, price after 1 year is $24.83</u>
<u />
Answer:
Amount received = 217,043.56 (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Monthly deposit = $400
Interest rate = 3.2% / 12 = 0.002667 per month
Number of year = 63 year - 35 year = 28 year
Number of period = 28 × 12 month = 336 month
Computation:
![Amount \ received = PMT[\frac{(1+r)^n-1}{r} ]\\\\Amount \ received = 400[\frac{(1+0.002667)^{336}-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{(1.002667)^{336}-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{2.44713794-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{1.44713794}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[542.608901]\\\\Amount \ received =217,043.56\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Amount%20%5C%20received%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%29%5En-1%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D%20400%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2B0.002667%29%5E%7B336%7D-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281.002667%29%5E%7B336%7D-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.44713794-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B1.44713794%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B542.608901%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D217%2C043.56%5C%5C%5C%5C)
Amount received = 217,043.56 (Approx)
The answer is B, Monopolies limit competition, which unbalance forces that rregulate the market system
Answer:
Zero- there is a $10 Million exemption equivalent ( d )
Explanation:
Annual exemption to be ignored = $15000
$1 million to an irrevocable trust
taxable gifts = $6 million
A) The amount of gift tax Nathan must remit in 2017 ignoring annual exemption
The gift tax must remit in 2017 is zero because there is a $10 million exemption because of the annual exception ( even if the annual exception is ignored ) and the lifetime benefits on taxable gifts that Nathan has is approximately $11.4 million, hence he wont be remitting any amount on gift tax in 2017
