The second amendment gives Americans the right to "keep and bear arms"
Hope I helped
The reason why the nine year old has an easy time of catching the ball while the three year old finds it difficult because the 9 year old has an increase reaction time in which he could respond easily to things that is being handed out to him, where as the three year old has a decrease reaction time, in which it makes it hard for him to cope up or respond to tasks that is being handed to him such as catching the ball.
A time should be divided among the points of need, plan and practicality based on the level of knowledge that the listeners have about each point.
<h3>
What does discussing of policy entails?</h3>
These discussion involves a group of people in a firm or public that are required to debate or ask important question during the formation of a policy that will guide them.
Hence, the time on the discussion is expected to be divided among the points of need, plan and practicality depending on the level of knowledge that listeners have about each point.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Missing options <em>"Each point should be one-third of the presentation. It depends on the level of knowledge that listeners have about each point. Need should be the primary point and be given most time. All three points should be summarized quickly to allow time for discussion."</em>
Read more about policy
<em>brainly.com/question/1578160</em>
Answer:
MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW............................................
Explanation:
MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW...............................
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
