Here is my new and revised answer from my own words.
The importance of the Marbury vs. Madision Case is that the Supreme Court applied the new concept of judicial review. In this court case, this was a crucial event because it would be the first time that it was properly used. Therefore, this allowed the government to easily distinguish if laws were considered constitutional or unconstitutional and overall set a strong foundation for the judicial branch of government in the near future.
I hope this answer helped with your question, and hope you have a lovely day!
The Modern Middle East<span> - A Political History Since the first </span>World War<span> ... From Islam to the Great </span>War<span> 9</span>2<span>. ... </span>Post<span>-1967 Settlements in the Occupied Territories 236 7. .... </span>conflict<span> resulted from the outcome of the Arab-Israeli </span>wars<span>, which </span>were<span> a ..... Inhospitable to similarly large urban settlements, the desert </span><span>did</span>
Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
The Supreme Court found Roosevelt's policies unconstitutional.
Answer:
Correct answer is c. Zerubbabel
.
Explanation:
C is the only correct answer as he was the one who led the Jews from Babylonian captivity during the reign of Cyrus the Great.
B is not correct as Jehoiachin was Zerubbabel grandfather and king of Judea.
A is not correct as Ezra was a scribe that depicted these events.
