1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
6

The area of a square piece of cardboard is 81 square inches. What is the length of the cardboard

Mathematics
1 answer:
vredina [299]3 years ago
6 0
9 because the square root of 81 is 9
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Can someone please explain to me asap? Will mark brainiest
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

It has a period of 180 degrees.

which equals (1/2) PI

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you find the bearing and speed of a ship?
Usimov [2.4K]
Finding the Bearing<span> of a </span>Ship<span> 
Example : A </span>ship<span> leaves the port of Miami with a </span>bearing<span> of S80◦E and a </span>speed<span> of. 15 knots. After 1 hour, the </span>ship<span> turns 90◦ toward the south.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Explain how both are correct./ bc I have the answer but I didn’t explain
Rudik [331]
They are both correct becuase lets say it was a shirt that was $30 and it was 30% off. For Jasani it would be 30 * 0.7 which equals $9 then you would subtract this 30 - 9 = 21. For Hanna it would be 30 - 0.3(30) which equals $21. So in the end they are both correct!
5 0
3 years ago
(a) A square has a perimeter of 32 ft. What is the length of each side?
vitfil [10]
A. 32/4=8
B. Square root of 9 = 3
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prove the divisibility of the following numbers: 8^10−8^9−8^8 by 55
    11·1 answer
  • Midge walked 7/8 mile Monday and 4/5 mile on Tuesday. let x = how much farther she walked on Monday.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following BEST supports the idea that Tybalt is a foil to Benvolio?
    6·1 answer
  • A softball player got a hit in 20 of her last 50 times at bat. What is the experimental probability
    11·1 answer
  • Use implicit differentiation to find dy/dx.<br> ln xy + 5x = 30. Please write out the steps.
    12·1 answer
  • Pls help me i will give brainlyiest
    6·1 answer
  • Is 48/70 closer to 1 or 0
    14·2 answers
  • A company is designing a new logo involving 2 circles. What is the area of the shaded portion between the 2 circles? (Use π = 3)
    6·1 answer
  • Help with this please!!
    14·2 answers
  • When 7 is subtracted from 3 times a certain number , the result is 28. What is the number
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!