A transaction is a simple task carried out as part of corporate operations. Transaction processing systems (TPS) handle business transactions for the corporation, supporting overall enterprise operations.
A TPS creates papers pertaining to a non-inquiry transaction and records the transaction itself, together with all of its results, in the database.
Today, TPS are required for business operations in practically every firm. TPSs feed information into organizational databases; they also serve as the framework for management-oriented information systems. Source data automation frequently involves direct data entering. Electronic data interchange is being utilized by transaction processing systems more and more. These systems offer computer-to-computer communication without the need for repeated data entry by substituting paper documents with formatted transaction data sent over telecommunications networks.
Learn more about information here-
brainly.com/question/15709585
#SPJ4
<span>B an idea for an invention that your dad mentioned briefly but did not write down</span>
Answer: a)Disruptive innovation
Explanation: Disruptive innovation is the innovation technique indulges in market through new market strategy and value network. This techniques damages the existing market market and its values .The displacement of the current product extincts from the market through this technique.
Other options are incorrect because paradigm shift is influence losing in the market and sustaining innovation is used for the improving the product's marketing and value .Thus, the correct option is option(a).
Answer:
C. Use the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records
The distinction between "computer architecture" and "computer organization" has become very fuzzy, if no completely confused or unusable. Computer architecture was essentially a contract with software stating unambiguously what the hardware does. The architecture was essentially a set of statements of the form "If you execute this instruction (or get an interrupt, etc.), then that is what happens. Computer organization, then, was a usually high-level description of the logic, memory, etc, used to implement that contract: These registers, those data paths, this connection to memory, etc.
Programs written to run on a particular computer architecture should always run correctly on that architecture no matter what computer organization (implementation) is used.
For example, both Intel and AMD processors have the same X86 architecture, but how the two companies implement that architecture (their computer organizations) is usually very different. The same programs run correctly on both, because the architecture is the same, but they may run at different speeds, because the organizations are different. Likewise, the many companies implementing MIPS, or ARM, or other processors are providing the same architecture - the same programs run correctly on all of them - but have very different high - level organizations inside them.