Answer:
Chuck must be less than $260,000
Explanation:
The economic decision rule is: Do it if that marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost and Since Chuck was unwilling to purchase the house at $260,000, we can deduce that the marginal benefit of purchasing the house must be less than $260,000 due to the fact that the seller turns down the offer but says she will sell the house for $260,000.
Answer:
1. $100,000 and 25%
2. $137,200 and 34.3%
3. $150,000 and 27%
Explanation:
1. It does not expand
a. Net income= $100,000 (as given in the question)
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
Shareholder’s equity= $400,000
Thus return on equity= 100000/400000 = 0.25 or 25%
2. It expands and issue $160,000 in debt
a. Net income= $100000 + 50000 – 12800 (debt interest 8% of $160000)
= $137,200
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 137200/400000
=0.343 or 34.3%
3. It expands and raises equity of $160000
a. Net Income= $100000 + 50000
= $150000
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 150000/(400000 + 160000)
Where ($560,000) 400000 + 160000 is shareholder’s equity
= 0.27 or 27%
Answer:
Net Income 193,000
Non-monetary terms:
Depreciation expense 25,000
amortization expense 10,000
gain on disposal <u> (7,000) </u>
Adjusted Income 221,000
Change in Working Capital:
Increase in A/R (27,000)
Decreasein Inv 17,000
Increase in Prepaid (5,000)
Increase Accrued /P 11,000
Decreasein A/P (6,000)
Change In Working Capital (10,000)
From Operating Activities 211,000
Investing
Sale of Equipment 47,000
Financing
Bonds Issued 60,000
Cash Flow 318,000
Beginning Cash 99,000
Cash Flow 318,000
Ending Cash 417,000
Explanation:
We first remove the non.monetary concetps from the net income.
Then we adjust for the change in working capital which are the incrase and decrease in the current assets and liabilities account
Increase in asset and decrease in liabilities represent cash outflow
while the opposite is true when an asset decrease(convert to cash) or a liablity increase (delay of the payment)
Answer:
d) $228,000 outflow
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount that the salaries should be reflected in the analysis
Using this formula
Salaries=Salaries expense-(Salaries expense*Tax rate)
Let plug in the formula
Salaries=$380,000-($380,000*40%)
Salaries=$380,000-$152,000
Salaries=$228,000 Outflow
Therefore salaries should be reflected in the analysis by a: $228,000 outflow
