Answer:
The answer is dispositional and situational, respectively.
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution judgement holds a person's internal traits as responsible for an outcome. In the example, you think the skier fell due to his lack of skills.
On the other hand, a situational attribution holds the conditions of the environment or the situation as responsible for the outcome.
Studies show that <u>situational attribution is more common when judging our own outcomes</u>, especially when negative.
Answer:
1) Felt out of place.
2) Stayed quiet
Explanation:
When someone gets placed in an unfamiliar situation with people they dont usually interact with - everyone has different responding methods based on their personality. I'm more introverted. Hence the above answer.
Answer: D. Systematic
Explanation: Harmon clothing is likely experiencing a systematic political risk. A systematic political risk can be explained as the political events, decision or regulations which can negatively affect the growth or survival of a business or investment in a particular country. Systematic political risks may affect all segments of a country's market or it might be targeted towards a particular sector or market segment. Systematic political risk may stem from wholesale change in policies and regulation of the host government due to change of power or shift in major economic decisions or protocol.
Answer:
156
Explanation:
125^2-25÷100 =156hundreds
