1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Free_Kalibri [48]
3 years ago
6

The people who came to the American colonies in the 17th century had already been exposed to the idea of limited government than

ks mainly to
A) the Magna Carta.
B) the Constitution.
C) the Council of Trent.
D) the Articles of Confederation.
History
2 answers:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
7 0
Hi! :)

Answer: A. the Magna Carta
Katena32 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The people who came to the American colonies in the 17th century had already been exposed to the idea of limited government thanks mainly to the Magna Carta. Option A is correct.

The Magna Carta or Magna Carta Liberatum is a charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. It was first drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury in order to make peace between the unpopular King and a group of rebel barons, it promised to protectect church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons.

You might be interested in
True or false A conference of nations was brought together in 1944 to create institutions that would ensure there would be no mo
Tanzania [10]
The answer is true so there u go :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which philosopher believed that people were inherently evil and that government should control them?
Inessa05 [86]

Explanation:

In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?

The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.

5 0
3 years ago
Who else does online homeschooling on time4learning?
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

not me, and im not homeschooled, but i use khan academy for stuff

8 0
2 years ago
What is the difference between a primary and secondary sources and give examples of each?
Ymorist [56]
Examples of primary sources include manuscripts, newspapers, speeches, cartoons, photographs, video, and artifacts. ... Secondary sources often use generalizations, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, articles, and reference books.
4 0
3 years ago
What was one result of high U.S. tariffs on imported goods?A) American businesses faced decreased profits. B) The European econo
Wewaii [24]
One result of high US tariff on imported goods is : D. Great britain and france struggled to repay their war Debt
by increasing the tariff of US imported goods, it's hard for britain and france to sell their goods in united states because the end price of the good would be too high compared to local product 

hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which idea do Lincoln and Lee share?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a result of the oil embargo in the united states?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the british relationship to india change after the sepoy rebellion?
    7·1 answer
  • List three ways to amend the florida constitution please
    10·1 answer
  • Who tried to abolish the slave trade?
    6·2 answers
  • What overall reason for the colonies to separate from Britain does Jefferson outline in the second paragraph
    10·2 answers
  • How would you use relative location to describe the location of Mongolia?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the main arguments that Thomas Paine makes in his pamphlet Common Sense? Why was this pamphlet so popular?
    9·1 answer
  • According to the article, the Civil Rights Movement was led by (select two)
    8·1 answer
  • Hlet, Common
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!