Because the independent nations had different policies which made it harder for the british to support the other people of the democracy. They were more "challnged".
Answer:
The electoral college consists of 538 electors, who choose the president of the United States. These electors are sent from the states, in proportion to their population, and in all states except for Maine and Nebraska, the electors are bound to the candidate that obtains the plurality of votes in the state.
Some presidents have been elected despite having lost the popular vote.
An example from the 19th century is Rutherford B. Hayes, who lost the popular vote to his contender, Samuel J. Tilden, but still won because he got 20 more electoral votes.
An example from the 21st century is the most recent election: Donald Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, but won the electoral college (304 votes vs Clinton's 227 votes). In part this is because Trump won several crucial states by very small margins, for example, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
D. The United States Department of the Interior
Answer:
Low-balling
Explanation:
There are four different methods of compliance (persuasion techniques) in psychology, including:
1. Foot-in-the-Door Technique.
2. Door-in-the-Face Technique.
3. Low-Balling.
4. Norm of Reciprocity.
Low-balling: In psychology, the term low-balling is referred to as a persuasion technique that involves an item being offered at a lower price initially to convince the buyer to buy that item and then the price of that particular item gets increased.
In the question above, the statement signifies the use of the low-balling technique.