1) in first place you must Know F(X) for every value of x
F(0) = 250(0.5)^0 = 250
f(1) = 250(0,5)^1 = 250*0,5 = 125
f(2)= 250(0,5)^2= 250*0,25 = 62,5
the average is = 250+125+62,5/ 3 = 145,83
To prove that <span>ΔABC ≅ ΔMQR using SAS, we show that two sides with the intersection angle are congruent.
From the diagram, it is shown that CA is congruent to RM.
From the first option, given that </span>m∠A = 64° and AB = MQ = 31 cm, then we have CA = RM, AB = MQ, and CAB = RMQ (i.e. m∠A = <span>m∠M = 64°). </span>
This shows that the first option is correct.
From the second option, given that CB = MQ = 29 cm, then we have CA = RM, <span>CB = MQ, but ACB is not congruent to RMQ.
Thus the second option in not correct.
From the third option, </span>m∠Q = 56° and CB ≅ RQ, then we have CA = RM, CB = RQ, ACB = 60<span>°, but we do not know the value of MRQ.
Thus the third option is not correct.
From the fourth option, </span>m∠R = 60° and AB ≅ MQ, then we have <span>CA = RM, AB = MQ, RMQ = </span>64<span>°, but we do not know the value of CAB.
Thus the fourth option is not correct.
From the fifth option</span>, <span>AB = QR = 31 cm, then we have </span><span>CA = RM, </span><span>AB = QR, but we do not know the value of CAB or MRQ.
Thus, the fifth option is not correct.
Therefore, the additional information that </span><span>could be used to prove ΔABC ≅ ΔMQR using SAS is </span><span>m∠A = 64° and AB = MQ = 31 cm</span>
Answer:
The probability would be 0.40
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
The elements in set S are,
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10,
Number of elements = 10,
Since, the outcomes are equally likely,
And, we know that,

So, the probability of getting 1, 2, 4, or 6 = 
Hence, the probability of the event E = {1, 2, 4, 6} is 0.40.
Answer:
(x, y, z) = (1, -3, 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Any number of calculators and/or web sites can be used to solve this system of equations. It can be helpful to familiarize yourself with your graphing calculator's capabilities in this area. The solution from one such site is shown below:
(x, y, z) = (1, -3, 1)
__
Both y and z show up in these equations with coefficients that have a magnitude of 1. This means you can easily use one of those equations to create a substitution for y or for z.
Using the first equation to write an expression for z, we have ...
z = 4x +3y +6
Substituting that into the second and third equations gives ...
6x -y +3(4x +3y +6) = 12 ⇒ 18x +8y = -6
8x +2y +4(4x +3y +6) = 6 ⇒ 24x +14y = -18
Now, we can subtract 4 times the first equation from 3 times the second to eliminate x:
3(24x +14y) -4(18x +8y) = 3(-18) -4(-6)
10y = -30
y = -3
Substituting into the first equation (of the equations in x and y), we have ...
18x +8(-3) = -6
18x = 18
x = 1
Finally, substituting into the equation for z gives ...
z = 4(1) +3(-3) +6 = 1
The solution is (x, y, z) = (1, -3, 1).
___
The equations can also be solved using Cramer's rule, elimination, matrix methods, and other means. When solving by hand, the method of choice will often depend on what you're familiar with and what the coefficients are.
Answer:1.323323332333...
1.96996999...
Step-by-step explanation:irrational numbers cannot be repeated like it can't be 1.22222... this would then be a rational number
If u check the answer given non of the numbers repeat in a *pattern*