Answer:
I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)
Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
- Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
- United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606
Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
- Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
- Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864
The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.
What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.
Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.
Answer:
So a favorable material price variance might be more than offset by an adverse usage variance
Explanation:
<em>Material price variance</em>
<em>A material price variance occurs where materials are purchased at a price either lower or higher than the standard price. </em>A favourable variance is recorded where the actual total cost of materials of a given quantity is lower that the standard cost. While an adverse variance implies the opposite
<em>Material usage variance</em>
<em>A material usage variance occurs when the standard quantity required to active a particular level of production is higher or lower than than the actual actual quantity used.</em> A favorable variance would mean than less quantity of materials were used than the standard to achieve a given output level. And an adverse variance would mean the opposite
<em>Relationship between Usage variance and Price variance</em>
Where savings are made from purchase of cheap and inferior quality materials these might lead to an adverse usage variance by a greater value .This is so because workers might need to use a larger quantity ( more than the standard required) of a low-quality materials to achieve production.
So a favourable material price variance might be more than offset by an adverse usage variance
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "B. the extent to which government legislation requires firms to provide health insurance for employees."
Here are the following choices:
<span>A. the education and skill levels of labor force participants
</span><span>B. the extent to which government legislation requires firms to provide health insurance for employees
</span><span>C. the degree to which the overall level of business activity fluctuates up and down
</span><span>D. the ease with which job seekers can obtain information about job openings</span>
Answer:
In essence, health insurance benefits enable employees to seek needed medical care. Disability insurance replaces a portion of employee income when they can't work because of an illness or disability. For the most part, disability insurance will not replace all of someone's income.
Explanation:
Answer: go to the national college this is what it is called NCCS
Explanation:
