Answer:option A is the correct answer
Explanation:
Drive is an act of motivation(for example; hunger) that have primarily biological purposes.
Needs motivate human beings. The need to satisfy hunger, sexual urges etc motivates man. Some needs may decrease when satisfied, while others may not.
When a need is satisfied, the drive to satisfy that need decreases. Therefore, a drive can be said to be a need of instinct.
One may a higher drive for need or a lower drive. For example, for a secondary drive such as getting wealth. One may have the need of wanting money but if the drive is not enough you may have to settle for less.
A group used in a study or in an experiment, which does not get treatment by the scientists and is used as a foundation to determine the functions of the other tested subjects is known as the control group. The control group is only found in an experimental investigation.
<span>Economists use graphs to analyze the choices and trade-offs that people make in a society. This is TRUE. </span>
Joseph Lister introduced modern methods but, louis pasteur is who guided joseph. Joseph is what they are looking for
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
