Hi!
Usually, in the business world, the reason for failure is due to the company running out of money this can be a culmination of all the reasons listed above or for other reasons, but a company is not really considered a failure until it runs out of money.
-<span>ASIAX </span><span> </span><span>Frequent Answerer</span>
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the sales section of the income statement is presented below:
<u>Income Statement
</u>
<u>For the year ended </u>
Sales
Sales revenue $903,400
Less:
Sales Discount $15,400
Sales return & allowances $22,000
Net Sales $866,000
hence the net sales is $866,000
The freight out would not be considered. Hence, ignored it
