Legislative power is the answer! !!
Answer: It is the Panama canal
Explanation:
<span>The protested by not buying or not using British goods by boycotting them. In 1773, some colonist that were still not happy with the taxes decided to put on the attires of traditional indians and sneakily got into ships in the harbours and dumped tea imported from Britain in the water.This became know as the Boston tea party, this action resulted in the closure of the Boston port. A similar event happened in York the following year</span>
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Wait you want us to write an entire essay for you?
