Answer:
DeBondt and Thaler (1985) found that the poorest-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>good</em> performance in the following period and that the best-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>poor</em> performance in the following time period.
Explanation:
DeBondt and Thaler carried out a study that examined stocks of 35 worst and best performing firms over a previous five-year period.The study showed that over the following three-year period, the firms that were previously performing poorly performed better than the former best performing firms, by an average of 25%.This reversal in the fortunes of stocks of firms in the following period is called the Reversal Effect.
Answer:
B. personal appeals
Explanation:
Personal appeals is a tactic used to influence the opinions of others towards a particular purpose,it is usually done to help another person or group of persons to get favoured by another person.
Brianna is most likely adopting the use the personal appeals to influence the opinions of Ollie concerning the payment time for the workers of Ollie.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
Integrated business planning (IBP), which consists of synchronizing commercial, financial and supply chain plans in a single holistic administrative process, is vital to meet the evolving requirements of modern supply chains. An advanced form of sales and operations planning (S&OP) is the IBP that is increasingly being adopted in the manufacturing, distribution and service sectors. Companies that implement IBP programs in a strategic way generally exceed 20% of gross margin on average to companies that apply S&OP in a more tactical and less integrated way.
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
If these error are nit corrected, the income before taxes be overstated by $ 35,000
.
As, Overstatement of Ending Inventory will affect the gross profit (Increase) by $ 25,000 and then understatement of Depreciation will further increase Net Profit by $ 10,000
Answer: parametric
Explanation:
As a general rule of thumb, when the dependent variable’s level of measurement is nominal (categorical) or ordinal, then a non-parametric test should be selected. When the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale, then a parametric test should typically be selected. Fortunately, the most frequently used parametric analyses have non-parametric counterparts. This can be useful when the assumptions of a parametric test are violated because you can choose the non-parametric alternative as a backup analysis.
